SOCIOLINGUISTICS PERSPECTIVE ON ACRONYMS FORM IN BAHASA INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47662/pedagogi.v8i2.387Kata Kunci:
language, society, acronymAbstrak
The background of this research deals with two problems, firstly language as an instrument of communication which is used by society and secondly the society as users and speakers of language as well as changes on vocabulary or acronyms. This research focused on the process of acronym formation in the Sociolinguistics perspective. Events in society are reflected in language, in this study the formation of acronyms. This study is a descriptive qualitative study, where social phenomena are described by their characteristics. The data were collected by observing and recording the acronym found. The source of this research data is Refly Harun's program on YouTube with the title "UBER" throughout 2022. The sample of this research is the "UBER" program on Refly Harun's YouTube in April and May 2022. The result of this study was 12 acronyms found, after being analyzed there were 3 groupings of the formation process. With the uniqueness of the process of determining the Indonesian language component mixed with a foreign language, it is shortened to an Indonesian acronym. Acronyms in the form of abbreviations that have been formed have meanings that attract attention.
Referensi
Anam, A. K., Hilaliyah, H., & Agustin, Y. (2021). Pembentukan dan Pembidangan Akronim pada Koran Pos Kota. Deiksis, 13(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v13i1.8032
An Introduction to Language Sixth Edition. Los Angeles: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Ardhian, D., Sumarlam, Purnanto, D., & Yustanto, H. (2021). Religious performance in Malang, Indonesia: Linguistic landscape on worship sign. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 983–1000. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.68
Chaer and Agustina. (2010). Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Rineka Cipta Jakarta.
Chaer, Abdul. 2008. Morfologi Bahasa Indonesia (Pendekatan Proses). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Creswell, J. W. 1994. Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Crystal, David. (1994). Dictionary of Language and Languages. London: Penguin Books.
Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Application Edited by Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs, and Gerard Van Herk (2013)
Izura, C., & Playfoot, D. (2012). A ormative study of acronyms and acronym naming. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 862–889. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2009). Pembentukan Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Mario Klarer. (2004). An Introduction to Literary Studies. Second Edition. 2004.
Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case Study Reseacrh in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (1993). Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia yang Disempurnakan (RI. No. 0543a/u/1987). Jakarta: PT.Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Quirk, Randolp. (2003). Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Satriani, Said, I. M., & Abbas, A. (2021). Neologisme dalam Media Sosial: Kajian Morfosemantik. Ilmu Budaya, 9(1), 177–184.
Wardhaugh and Holmes. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Longman
Wiersima, W. (1995). Research Method in Education. Massachusetts: A Simon and Schuster Company.
Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language Third Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zerkina, N., Kostina, N., & Pitina, S. A. (2015). Abbreviation Semantics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Zdenek, Salzmann. (1998). Language, Culture and Society an Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology Second Edition. New York : Avalon Publishing.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
