Students’ Perceptions of Context-Based Learning and Its Role in Developing Reading Skill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47662/ejeee.v4i2.916Keywords:
Students’ Perception, Context-Based Learning, reading skillsAbstract
This study investigates students' perceptions of Context-Based Learning (CBL) and its effectiveness in enhancing reading skills, particularly in the context of digital and multicultural learning environments. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires with 30 ninth-grade students at SMP Plus Shafiyyatul Amaliyyah. Thematic analysis was conducted to explore the students' experiences and perceptions regarding CBL. The findings revealed that students generally hold positive views toward CBL, with 85% reporting increased engagement when reading materials were connected to real-life contexts. Furthermore, 70% noted an improvement in their understanding of complex texts. However, challenges emerged in digital reading environments, as 60% of participants expressed difficulties in navigating digital platforms, which impacted their comprehension. Additionally, the integration of culturally relevant contexts significantly motivated students and enhanced their understanding of reading materials. This research fills a critical gap in understanding students' perspectives on CBL in relation to reading skills development. It highlights the importance of adapting CBL strategies for digital contexts and diverse classrooms to improve educational outcomes. The study calls for enhanced teacher training to effectively implement CBL in these settings.
Keyword: Students’ Perception, Context-Based Learning, reading skill.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(2), 219-227.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2020). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Aldine Transaction.
García, O., & Torres, C. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching: The future of education. Journal of Multicultural Education, 15(3), 345-359.
Jenkins, J. R., & Stewart, R. A. (2019). The importance of context in reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 40(1), 57-83.
Kim, S. H., Park, H. J., & Lee, S. Y. (2020). Context-based learning and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 23-46.
Lee, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Professional development in context-based learning: Preparing teachers for diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, 103971.
Nguyen, H. T., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Digital storytelling as a tool for enhancing reading comprehension in context-based learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 15-30.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., & Duan, N. (2019). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
Patel, S., & Singh, A. (2021). Navigating digital texts: Challenges and strategies for enhancing reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(3), 249-270.
Smith, T., & Jones, L. (2020). Contextualized learning: Enhancing comprehension through relevance. Educational Review, 72(2), 230-246.
Vella, J. (2021). Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. Jossey-Bass.
Zhang, Y. (2021). Assessing learner perceptions of contextualized learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 701-715.
Anderson, L. W. (2022). Learning outcomes and assessment in education. Educational Assessment Journal, 45(1), 34-50.
Brown, H. D. (2020). Principles of language learning and teaching (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Chomsky, N. (2019). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Davis, F. D., & Wilson, T. D. (2020). The role of technology in modern education. International Journal of Technology in Education, 10(2), 150-165.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2020). Schools, academic motivation, and academic achievement: A self-system perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 120-142). Information Age Publishing.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2019). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 91- 100.
Gardner, H. (2021). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2019). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2020). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Libraries Unlimited.
Meyer, K. A. (2021). Creating a culture of learning: Strategies for engagement and retention. Journal of Educational Leadership, 56(3), 40-54.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2021). Instructional-design theories and models: Volume III: Building a common knowledge base. Routledge.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2021). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. XICOM.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 EXCELLENCE: Journal of English and English Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
