Changes in Students’ Writing Style After Using a Grammar Checking App: A Reflective Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47662/ejeee.v6i1.1403Keywords:
Grammar checking application, writing, academic writingAbstract
Students' writing growth has been greatly impacted by the incorporation of grammar-checking software into language learning, especially in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. This study focuses on the linguistic and cognitive aspects of writing in order to examine how students' writing styles alter after utilizing a grammar-checking program. 25 undergraduate students taking an academic writing course participated in this study, which used a qualitative reflective design. Semi-structured interviews, reflective diaries, pre- and post-writing assignments, and document analysis were used to gather data. To find patterns of change in grammatical accuracy, lexical diversity, sentence complexity, coherence, and writing autonomy, the data were subjected to thematic analysis. The results show that using grammar checking software greatly enhances students' writing, especially in terms of improving grammatical accuracy, increasing vocabulary, and encouraging more intricate sentence patterns. Students also exhibit higher levels of engagement with the editing process and metacognitive awareness. However, the study also highlights some disadvantages, like an excessive dependence on automated feedback and a poor critical comprehension of grammatical principles. Grammar checking software is therefore a useful tool for enhancing writing quality, but in order to guarantee deeper learning and critical engagement, its use should be accompanied by instructional assistance.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing on EFL learners’ writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787-815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1248872
Ferris, D. R. (2014). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173293
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719818
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 1-19). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103926
Li, M. (2023). Automated writing evaluation and its effects on EFL learners’ writing. System, 113, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.102995
Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice. Routledge.
Sun, Y. (2020). Extensive writing in foreign-language classrooms: A blogging approach. Computers & Education, 156, 103907.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103907
Warschauer, M. (2010). Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.04.001
Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts. System, 65, 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.004
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2020). Types, features, and effectiveness of automated writing evaluation systems. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1781633
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Hsu, H. C. (2019). The impact of automated writing evaluation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1540432
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.08.003
Kessler, G. (2012). Student-initiated attention to form in collaborative writing. System, 40(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.008
Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2011). Exploring the blogosphere. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.11.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EXCELLENCE: Journal of English and English Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
