Male and Female Information Systems Students' Communication Styles in Academic Discussions: A Sociolinguistic Study at Batuta University Medan

Authors

  • Dwi Suci Amaniarsih Universitas Potensi Utama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47662/ejeee.v6i1.1431

Keywords:

communication styles, gender, sociolinguistics, academic discussion, university students.

Abstract

Communication styles play a significant role in shaping students' participation and interaction during academic discussions. Gender has been identified as one of the social factors that may influence communication behaviors in educational settings. This study aimed to investigate the communication styles of male and female students during academic discussions in the Information Management Study Program at Batuta University Medan. The study employed a qualitative descriptive case study design involving 30 students, consisting of 15 male students and 15 female students. Data were collected through classroom observations, audio-recorded discussions, and semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify communication patterns and interactional features. The findings revealed that male students tended to employ more direct, assertive, and competitive communication styles, as reflected in their higher frequency of initiating discussion topics, presenting arguments, and interrupting conversations. Female students, on the other hand, demonstrated more collaborative and supportive communication styles through the use of clarification questions, supportive feedback, and cooperative interaction strategies. Despite these differences, both groups actively participated in academic discussions and contributed valuable ideas. The study concludes that communication styles are influenced not only by gender but also by educational context and classroom culture. The findings contribute to sociolinguistic research on gender and communication and provide pedagogical implications for promoting inclusive and effective classroom interaction in higher education.

References

Al Fadda, H. A. (2020). Determining how social media affects learning English: An investigation of mobile applications Instagram and Snapchat in TESOL classroom. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.1

Apriyanto, S., & Anum, A. (2018). Gender dynamics on speaking interaction in the college classroom. Jurnal SMART, 4(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.52657/js.v4i2.692

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Coates, J. (2016). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage. Guest,

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Emilia, E., Moecharam, N. Y., & Syifa, I. L. (2017). Gender in EFL classroom: Transitivity analysis in English textbooks for Indonesian students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6877

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. Harper & Row.

Lee, J. J., & McCabe, J. M. (2021). Who speaks and who listens: Revisiting the chilly climate in college classrooms. Gender & Society, 35(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220977141

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Norton, R. W. (1983). Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Sage Publications.

Opina, K. G. (2017). Verbal communication behaviors: How male and female university students interact in gendered talks. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(5), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20170505.13

Paltridge, B. (2021). Discourse analysis: An introduction (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Stone, P., & Kidd, A. (2011). Students’ social positioning in the language classroom: Implications for interaction. RELC Journal, 42(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211424664

Talbot, M. (2019). Language and gender (3rd ed.). Polity Press.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine Books.

Tussa’diah, H., Siregar, W., & Batubara, M. H. (2021). Language model of male and female students (Sociolinguistic study). Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v2i1.529

Wahyuni, Kelsaba, S. A., Humairah, A. N., Arisanti, F., Saiful, & Qalbi. (2025). Gender differences in language use among EFL students: A sociolinguistic analysis. Kopula: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v8i1.9414

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics (9th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Wolfe, J. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and classroom discourse: Communication patterns of Hispanic and White students in networked classrooms. Written Communication, 17(4), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088300017004003

Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bukhari, S., & Hussain, M. S. (2026). Spoken interaction between university students: A study of gendered discourse patterns. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt2007

Ridayani, L., Badri, W., & Susyla, D. (2025). Gender differentiation in classroom interaction: A critical discourse analysis of teacher–student talk. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.36085/telle.v5i3.9510

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026